ON FRIDAY
NOVEMBER 27, 2015
Email your feedback and
queries to: propertyqs@
thesundaily.comX
>Criminalising non-payment of service charge
TheStrataManagement Tribunal
T
HE
freedomof “no payment
of service charges” will end
with the establishment of
the StrataManagement
ribunal (SMTribunal). Any parcel
owner or tenant who fails to pay
service charges can be produced
before the SMTribunal with the
implementation of the Strata
Management Act 2013; the Strata
Management (Maintenance &
Management) Regulations 2015
enforced on June 2, 2015; and the
StrataManagement (SMTribunal)
Regulations 2015, effected July 1,
2015. It is interesting to note that
limitation is not applicable to the
SMTribunal and themaximum that
can be claimed is RM250,000 per
claim. Any non-compliance of an
award (decision) of the SM
Tribunal is now a criminal offence.
“
Any personwho fails to comply
with an awardmade by the tribunal
commits an offence and shall, on
conviction, be liable to a fine not
exceeding RM250,000 or
imprisonment for a termnot
exceeding three years, or both. In the
case of a continuing offence, to a
further fine not exceeding RM5,000
for every day or part thereof, during
which the offence continues after
conviction.
”(Section 123)
JURISDICTIONOF TRIBUNAL
The tribunal shall have the
jurisdiction to hear and determine
any claims where the total amount
in respect of which an award of the
tribunal is sought, does not exceed
RM250,000 or such other amount as
may be prescribed to substitute the
total amount.
BY
DATO’ PRETAM SINGH
DARSHAN SINGH
LEGAL INPUT
Claims can be filed in relation to
the following:
1. A dispute or complaint
concerning an exercise or the
performance of, or the failure
to exercise or perform, a
function, duty or power
conferred or imposed by Strata
Management Act 2013 or the
by-laws;
2. A dispute on costs or repairs in
respect of a defect in a parcel,
building or land intended for
subdivision into parcels, or
subdivided building or land,
and its common property or
limited common property;
3. A claim for the recovery of
charges, or contribution to the
sinking fund, or any amount
which is declared by the
provisions of this Act as a debt;
4. A claim for an order to
convene a general meeting;
5. A claim for an order to
invalidate proceedings
of meeting where any
provision of the Act has
been contravened;
6. A claim for an order to nullify a
resolutionwhere voting rights
has been denied or where due
notice has not been given;
7. A claim for an order to nullify
a resolution passed at a
general meeting;
8. A claim for an order to revoke
amendment of by-laws having
regard to the interests of all the
parcel owners or proprietors;
9. A claim for an order to vary the
rate of interest fixed by the
joint management body,
management corporation or
subsidiarymanagement
corporation for late payment of
charges, or contribution to the
sinking fund;
10. A claim for an order to vary
the amount of insurance to
be provided;
11. A claim for an order to pursue
an insurance claim;
12. A claim for compelling a
developer, joint management
body, management
corporation or subsidiary
management corporation
to supply information
or documents;
13. A claim for an order to give
consent to effect alterations to
any common property or
The Order that the
SMTribunal can
make include:
1. Pay a sumof money
to another party;
2. Order the price or other
consideration paid by a party
to be refunded to that party;
3. Order the payment of
compensation or damages for
any loss or damage suffered by
a party;
4. Order the rectification, setting
aside or variation of a contract
or additional by-laws, wholly
or in part;
5. Order costs to or against any
party to be paid;
6. Order interest to be paid on
any sumor monetary award at
a rate not exceeding eight per
centumper annum;
7. Dismiss a claimwhich it
considers to be frivolous
or vexatious;
8. Any other order as it deems
just and expedient; or
9. Make such ancillary or
consequential orders or relief
as may be necessary to give
effect to any order made by
the tribunal.
EXCLUSION OF
JURISDICTION IN COURT
Where a claim is filedwith the SM
Tribunal and the claim is within the
tribunal’s jurisdiction, the issues in
dispute in that claim, whether as
shown in the initial claimor as
emerging in the course of the
hearing, shall not be the subject of
proceedings between the same
parties in any court unless—
(a) the proceedings before the
court were commenced before the
claimwas filedwith the tribunal;
or (b) the claimbefore the tribunal
is withdrawn, abandoned or
struck out.
This means that a claimant has to
decide in advance as towhich forum
he has to file a case because having
filed a case with the SMTribunal, he
will not be able to proceedwith the
same in the court or vice versa.
limited common property; or
14. A claim for an order to affirm,
vary or revoke the
commissioner of
building’s decision.